10 Arguments Against Content Warnings … And Why They’re Wrong

All About Content Warnings

Content warnings (sometimes conflated with trigger warnings) are those missives that suggest some viewers should exercise caution with watching or reading the story and characters of a book, TV show or movie.

Here are some standard content warnings we have all seen …

  • ‘Contains scenes that some viewers may find disturbing’
  • ‘Parental advisory: explicit content’
  • ‘Contains scenes of a sexual nature’
  • ‘Contains strong language.’
  • ‘Includes sexual violence or dubious consent’

Of course, for some people, content warnings have the opposite effect and make them MORE eager to read or watch something. This is why others may believe content warnings are pointless, especially since ‘there’s no such thing as bad publicity’. B2W has a certain sympathy for this argument, though not enough to take content warnings away altogether.

Others say they don’t like content warnings because they offer ‘spoilers’ or because ‘readers and viewers know what they are getting into’ because they read the blurb. (Personally I think both of these arguments are bilge. If a content warning is a spoiler, so is the blurb … and as we know, blurbs don’t give away the whole story! In fact, we can read the blurb and STILL end up reading or watching something wildly different to what we expected).

So it should be noted here B2W ultimately supports content warnings. Hell I have even warned Bang2writers umpteen times to NOT follow me or read my posts if they don’t like explicit language!

FYI: This post also has a content warning!!!

I also include one for this post you’re reading right now because of the pics of racist caricatures towards the bottom … So do feel free to give the rest a miss if you can do without pics of yellowface, golli***s and other such assholery nonsense.

from Twitter moments

Content Warnings In The News

Hardly a week goes by without someone decrying the nature of ‘cancel culture’. The most recent to get the gammons in a froth is probably Doctor Seuss. The late author’s own estate pulled six books due to racist imagery, especially of black and Chinese people.

As ever, people lined up to cry ‘censorship!’, wilfully ignoring the following …

  • The estate itself pulled the books. Whilst discussion of Seuss’ content has been ‘years in the making’, there had been no specific demand the estate do anything
  • All 6 titles were very obscure, so it was more likely the books were not selling well (supply & demand)
  • Oh would you look at that … The existing, classic Dr. Seuss such as Cat in the Hat and Green Eggs And Ham titles then rocketed up the charts! (Funny that).

In other words then, the late author’s estate made a business decision … which paid off handsomely for them! That’s the very opposite of ‘censorship’ and ‘cancel culture’. It’s PLAYING THE MARKET.

Content Warning Rows

In the summer of 2020, white people decided to stand in solidarity with Black Lives Matter (aka BLM) after the murder of George Floyd. From there we saw what appeared to be a seismic shift in the creative industries and across social media.

Writers, filmmakers, producers and publishers alike committed to being more inclusive of black creatives.

Fast forward to winter 2020 however and this had happened …

Racism And Storytelling

Before I was even born, The Black And White Minstrel Show was finally cancelled. I am assuming no writer would argue for the likes of that literal shitshow to be reinstated, so it’s odd that some see content warnings as so ‘controversial’.

Especially when we look at DVD boxes and see THIS …

Or if you turn on Netflix or Prime, you get THIS  too …

I’ve noticed the same people complaining about content warnings rarely focus their vitriol on film classifications anymore.

I find it odd that standard content warnings of stuff like discriminatory language, fantasy violence or even bloody horror are apparently ‘fine’ … Yet warnings about stereotypes are suddenly some snowflakey thing?? Weird.

Anyway, here’s a round-up of some of the more recent arguments I saw made on social media about the content warnings surrounding Gone With The Wind and Flash Gordon.

1) ‘Gone With The Wind was made in another time, they didn’t know’

Erm, they did. People have complained about this book and its movie adaptation since it came out back in the 1930s. The notion ‘no one cared’ before the modern, so-called ‘woke era’ is a full-on FIB.

2) ‘Gone With The Wind’ is a classic’

Yes, it is. Loads of people love it, which means some black people will love it too. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t stereotype its black characters, though. Most writers would argue against using stereotypes in their own writing, so it’s strange they would defend it here.

3) ‘It’s censorship to take it away from us’

Censorship refers to prohibition of something and Gone With The Wind was never prohibited from sale. It was only ever removed from the streaming catalogue temporarily to add that content warning. It was always stressed it was a temporary measure.

The movie is not only back now, having a content warning for stereotypical portrayals of a marginalised community does not adversely affect our viewing experience in any way. Hell, THIS VERSION on Amazon Prime’s UK site doesn’t even appear to have a content warning anyway!

 4) ‘Ming The Merciless is an alien’

Yes he is supposed to be an alien, but sci fi and fantasy has a long history of ‘othering’ those from BIPOC (aka BAME) backgrounds which cannot be ignored.

Ming was also conceived in 1934 during a time that was especially Sinophobic (aka racism against Chinese people and by extension other East Asian people, especially if they are mistaken as Chinese).

This is why the character is called ‘Ming’ (which most people in the West can associate easily with The Ming Dynasty, or at least a Ming vase). He even comes from the planet Mongo (drawing on the word ‘mongol’).

Sinophobia is especially relevant in the Covid era, where racist attacks on East Asians have risen sharply. If you think the link between racist stereotypes and hate crimes is an exaggeration, Variety offers this thought-provoking article … How Hollywood Is Complicit In Violence Against Asians In America.

A Quick Note on Antisemitism Too

Of course, not only BIPOC people can be stereotyped by the sci fi and fantasy genres. Religion/ethnicity is another. There has long been discussion about the representation of Jewish people in both, such as the bankers in the Harry Potter franchise.

I will admit as a completely secular person religion is something of a blind spot of mine (I wouldn’t even count myself as atheist, religion is literally not on my radar, even to reject it!). I had not realised anything about these stereotypes or myths until Jewish writer friends brought it to my attention. Once I had seen it, it was like WHOA — this stuff is everywhere!

What’s more, antisemitism so frequently goes unchallenged, even by those calling themselves progressives. Sometimes it’s because we don’t understand how pervasive and insidious the stereotypes are … In more depressing cases, the same people with BLM in their handles who’d (rightly) say ‘dominant voices don’t get to define what is racist’ will nevertheless insist o

Go to Source